Disclaimer






"I am a BLOGGER NOT an expert. This is a BLOG not a 'go-to' website for official information. I represent no one's view save my own. I have neither legal nor financial training, nor do I have anything to do with the real estate industry. My understanding of the Collective Sale Process is from a layman's position only. My calculations, computations and tables are homespun and may contain errors. Please note that nothing in this blog constitutes any legal or financial advice to anyone reading it. You should refer to your lawyer, CSC or financial adviser for expert advice before making any decision. This disclaimer is applicable to every post and comment on the blog. Read at your own risk."
Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu
There is one thing worse than an Enbloc ----- and that is an Enbloc done badly. Since the majority have the necessary mandate to sell, then they owe it to all SPs to make a success of it. Minority SPs can only watch and wait, if they sell then lets pray it's at a price we can move on with, if they don't sell, then we are happy to stay for a few more years.

High Court OS

By now, all the majority owners would have received a 44 page email copy of the Originating Summons N0. 941 0f 2008/P from the en bloc lawyer.

High Court Hearing Date and Time: tomorrow afternoon. The hearing is closed to the public.
.
Decision date: 05 Sept 2008

2 comments:

  1. Anonymous18 July, 2008

    Why Submission to High Court by majority owners to challenge STB

    STB (deleted) has breached Act that was passed by Parliament on 19th October 2004 and assented to by the President on 4th November 2004 applicable to;

    BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND STRATA MANAGEMENT ACT 2004(No. 47 of 2004) PART VI DISPUTES AND STRATA TITLES BOARDS

    Division 1 — Strata Titles Boards
    Act passed by parliament states as follows;
    Part 92 section (9) A Board shall carry out its work expeditiously and shall make a final order or determination within 6 months from the date it is constituted or within such extension of time as may be granted by the Minister.

    There was no extension sought or granted by Minister and according to Act final order and determination on Tampines Court was supposed happen before 7th of July. STB Deputy President has pushed hearing until 7th of August thereby breaching act by more than 30 days. Note that was just a date for hearing not even determination as supposed to be according to Act.

    (deleted)

    Majority has right to appeal to High Court, as there was a clear breaching of Parliament Act by STB (deleted).

    (This post has been moderated by blog administrator)

    ReplyDelete
  2. In which case, Sir, the beef is between the majority and the STB. The minority have nothing whatsoever to do with it. We have neither defaulted nor delayed.

    Our rights must be respected with regard to having a full and fair Hearing. There can be no rush to finish, no forcing of decisions, no cutting short cross examinations and time lines to the advantage of one side.

    I am reminded of Choo Han Teck's words which went something like 'if the majority wins it is because it is right, and not because it is the majority'.

    BTW. It is of course the majority's right to appeal, I have never said otherwise, that is the nature of the legal system.

    ReplyDelete