"I am a BLOGGER NOT an expert. This is a BLOG not a 'go-to' website for official information. I represent no one's view save my own. I have neither legal nor financial training, nor do I have anything to do with the real estate industry. My understanding of the Collective Sale Process is from a layman's position only. My calculations, computations and tables are homespun and may contain errors. Please note that nothing in this blog constitutes any legal or financial advice to anyone reading it. You should refer to your lawyer, CSC or financial adviser for expert advice before making any decision. This disclaimer is applicable to every post and comment on the blog. Read at your own risk."
Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu
There is one thing worse than an Enbloc ----- and that is an Enbloc done badly. Since the majority have the necessary mandate to sell, then they owe it to all SPs to make a success of it. Minority SPs can only watch and wait, if they sell then lets pray it's at a price we can move on with, if they don't sell, then we are happy to stay for a few more years.

The Time Line

Put your home on the open market and you can sell it in 3 months.

Put your home through an en bloc sale and it could take as long as:-

12+12+12+2+y = 3 to 4 years!
12 = first 12 months from date of election of sale committee at an EGM. This first 12 months is  for the sale committee to get its first signature on the CSA, failing which the sale committee is automatically dissolved and the process ends.

12 = second 12 months starts ticking from the date of the first CSA signing (Date of Agreement).  A lot of estates manage to get their last signature on the last day. I don't see why an owner would rush forward to sign at the beginning, locking themselves into a binding legal contract.

12 = this third 12 months begins at the 80% date or later if a higher percentage is obtained within the 12 months period from date of first signature. This period is used to sell the estate and make an application to the STB for sale.

Unknown:  Time for Completion of Sale after STB Approval. This is in the S&P and varies from sale to sale. Lots to look out for here. Usually 3-6 months after STB Approval but really depends on conditions in the S&P


2 = time taken in months for STB mediation (if there are objectors to the sale). If mediation between objecting owners and sale committee is at a stalemate,  then a stop order will be issued after 60 days and the matter goes to High Court, unless the objecting owners withdraw their objections.

y = time taken for High Court hearings, Appellate Court hearings.

Now, thanks to the KOON SENG HOUSE HIGH COURT RULING on 27 Oct 2009 there is a new cat among the pigeons and this one is a real doozy!

(12)m: this is the SUPPLEMENTAL CSA (SCSA), should there be one. A supplemental CSA starts a new 12 months AFRESH! m is the multiple for number of SCSAs attempted (so far, only 1 in estates that I know of - but the potential for abuse is there). 

So POTENTALLY it can be 12+12+12+12+12+12+.....til the cows come home - i.e until there is an eventual sale if the majority so wish.

Holy cow to that one! 

Koon Seng House; 27 Oct 2009, High Court
7    Subsequently, however, when bids were invited for purchase of the property, there was only one offer for $18,800,000. Realising that the reserve price then was too high, the owners agreed (after discussion) to reduce the reserve price to $19,800,000. To effect this variation in the CSA, a supplemental agreement was signed. The first signature to the supplemental agreement was appended on 24 March 2007. By 7 May 2007, the owners of 27 out of 33 units (including the nine terrace houses) had signed the agreement. Other owners progressively added their signatures so that by 6 September 2007, the owners of 30 out of 33 units had validly signed the supplemental agreement. This included the owners of 21 out of 24 flats.

35    The plaintiff contended that the application to the Board, which was made on 16 April 2008 for a collective sale order, was out of time. In his view, the application had to be made within 12 months after the first owner appended his signature to the first CSA, that is, by 28 December 2007. This view was erroneous for two reasons.
36    First, where an earlier CSA had failed to achieve its intended purpose, ie, to sell the land to a purchaser, the proprietors of the land could not be precluded from making a new agreement with a lower reserve price. Hence, the supplemental agreement constituted a fresh agreement. Therefore, time for the purpose of para 1A(a) of the Schedule should be reckoned from the date the first signature was appended to the supplemental agreement.
37    Second, s 84E(3)(b) provides that proprietors holding not less than 80% of the aggregate share value may apply to the Board for a collective sale order. At the earliest, the 12-month period within which application may be made to the Board starts when 80% majority has been reached or first crossed (as the case may be). The plaintiff was therefore wrong to say that time for this purpose started running from the date of the first signature. There are two distinct 12-month periods. As I said, application may be made to the Board as soon as 80% majority has been reached or first crossed. However, this does not mean that the 12-month period within which application must be made to the Board necessarily starts then (seepara 1(a) of the Schedule). For example, it could start at a later date when a greater percentage majority is reached so long as the time elapsed from the first signature to the time when such desired majority is reached is also not greater than 12 months (see para 1A of the Schedule).
38    The first signature to the supplemental agreement was appended on 24 March 2007 and the last was on 6 September 2007 (well within the 12-month period within which a majority of not less than 80% had to be reached). The other 12-month period (ie, that within which application to the Board had to be made) commenced on 6 September 2007. Therefore, the application made on 16 April 2008 was well within time.

No comments:

Post a Comment