"I am a BLOGGER NOT an expert. This is a BLOG not a 'go-to' website for official information. I represent no one's view save my own. I have neither legal nor financial training, nor do I have anything to do with the real estate industry. My understanding of the Collective Sale Process is from a layman's position only. My calculations, computations and tables are homespun and may contain errors. Please note that nothing in this blog constitutes any legal or financial advice to anyone reading it. You should refer to your lawyer, CSC or financial adviser for expert advice before making any decision. This disclaimer is applicable to every post and comment on the blog. Read at your own risk."
Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu
There is one thing worse than an Enbloc ----- and that is an Enbloc done badly. Since the majority have the necessary mandate to sell, then they owe it to all SPs to make a success of it. Minority SPs can only watch and wait, if they sell then lets pray it's at a price we can move on with, if they don't sell, then we are happy to stay for a few more years.


Agent drops en bloc for Clementi Park

Well, I have been told this is just a ploy in order to avoid being hit by the new rules. They want to avoid being caught by the 50% rule for round 2 -  that in the event of a failed first attempt, a second attempt will require a higher approval rate from owners to form a sale committee. By cancelling this attempt before the new rules kick in, they can start afresh with just  a 20% requisition.

Looking at their pretty website here , it seems the sale committee has been hanging on since 2007.

The sale committee will probably try to reconstitute in July and start all over again.

When it tried to go en bloc four years ago, Clementi Park failed to get 50 per cent of its residents’ vote.
This time round, its marketing agent Knight Frank withdrew from the collective sale exercise.
In the minutes of a recent meeting – which was obtained by Media-Corp – the company said it did not have the “confidence” that it could get 80 per cent of the condominium’s owners to agree to a collective sale. This was based on a survey in which 382 out of 489 owners took part.
The firm noted that “a good number” of owners did not wish to sell their apartments which are located on one million sq ft of undulating freehold land. Also, it was difficult to get owners of the 28-year-old property to agree to “one method of apportionment” because of the diversity of share values and strata area.
As for whether the 80 per cent consensus could be achieved if the reserve price was increased from $1.25 billion to $1.4 billion, Knight Frank’s opinion was that “under the current market conditions, it would be challenging”.
But it is not a case of price as the market is “buoyant”, according to Suntec Chesterton International’s head of research and consultancy Colin Tan. Rather, “these owners don’t want to sell, and Knight Frank, sensing their stubbornness, decided to pull out,” he said.
The collective sale committee (CSC), at its final meeting on June 8 had considered appointing another marketing agent.
But most members concluded that based on “current market conditions and current ownership profile”, the result was likely to be same and it would be “futile” to do so.
The sale exercise was aborted and the CSC was terminated.
Clementi Park resident Robert Bacsafra, for one, is disappointed with the outcome. He said he would have got between $2.5 to $3 million for his unit.
Source : Today – 19 Jun 2010

No comments:

Post a Comment