Disclaimer






"I am a BLOGGER NOT an expert. This is a BLOG not a 'go-to' website for official information. I represent no one's view save my own. I have neither legal nor financial training, nor do I have anything to do with the real estate industry. My understanding of the Collective Sale Process is from a layman's position only. My calculations, computations and tables are homespun and may contain errors. Please note that nothing in this blog constitutes any legal or financial advice to anyone reading it. You should refer to your lawyer, CSC or financial adviser for expert advice before making any decision. This disclaimer is applicable to every post and comment on the blog. Read at your own risk."
Drop Down MenusCSS Drop Down MenuPure CSS Dropdown Menu
There is one thing worse than an Enbloc ----- and that is an Enbloc done badly. Since the majority have the necessary mandate to sell, then they owe it to all SPs to make a success of it. Minority SPs can only watch and wait, if they sell then lets pray it's at a price we can move on with, if they don't sell, then we are happy to stay for a few more years.

R: Meeting Minutes 11/2/2012

Further to my post Fishing for contact details about the SC trying to obtain owners contact details from the management office:  they wrote in their recent minutes:

"The Management Council (MC) does not want to provide their contact particulars to SC . Many such residents are complaining to SC  that they are not receiving updated notices on enbloc process. SC is trying to reach out to as many SPs as possible. However, the MC office has informed to SC member, Mr Srinivasan that there is no bar for SC to go door to door to find out details of tenanted units.
The SC also discussed on the issue of putting up notices and as per SC understanding the notices are required to be put up in the notice boards available  in the Building as per the strata act. The SC decided to seek clarification from MC on this issue."

Perhaps the residents who complain to the SC about not receiving updated notices could, at the time they are complaining, offer the SC their emails/handphone numbers; that would solve the problem!

The default position is NOT that everyone in the estate would be happy for the management office to hand over their contact details to the SC and by necessity, the marketing agent! Some of us actually protect our emails addresses and number from those who would send us spam.....

No comments:

Post a Comment